AI for Predictive Service and Resilience
Keywords:
AI-native, Customer Experience, Service Design, Predictive Service Delivery Services, Customer Experience Management, AI in Operations.Abstract
Customer experience fabrics offer a holistic, journey-level view of service delivery and consumption. This paper introduces AI-native service interfaces—a new class of interface, distinct from conventional human-facing and automated interfaces, designed explicitly for consumption by intelligent machines rather than people. By embedding predictive functionalities into the customer journey, these interfaces shift service delivery from a reactive to a predictive model and enhance the resilience of underlying operations.
The paper identifies the data acquisition and fusion methods required to predict user intentions, service requests, and incident occurrences, and examines how redundancy, fault tolerance, and self-healing architectures—the three critical dimensions of operational resilience—support this predictive model. It further describes the architectural, operational, and data interdependencies that govern these predictive capabilities. Empirical evidence from AI-enabled tiered customer support in e-commerce substantiates the analysis.
References
1. Ayvaz, S., & Alpay, K. (2021). Predictive maintenance system for production lines in manufacturing: A machine learning approach using IoT data in real-time. Expert Systems with Applications, 173, Article 114598.
2. Theissler, A., Pérez-Velázquez, J., Kettelgerdes, M., & Elger, G. (2021). Predictive maintenance enabled by machine learning: Use cases and challenges in the automotive industry. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 215, Article 107864.
3. Leukel, J., González, J., & Riekert, M. (2021). Adoption of machine learning technology for failure prediction in industrial maintenance: A systematic review. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 61, 87–96.
4. Loganathan, R. (2022). Converging Security Architecture and Compliance Management in Enterprise Data Center Ecosystems: A Unified Control Framework. International Journal of Scientific Research and Modern Technology, 1(12), 295-312.
5. Nacchia, M., Fruggiero, F., Lambiase, A., & Bruton, K. (2021). A systematic mapping of the advancing use of machine learning techniques for predictive maintenance in the manufacturing sector. Applied Sciences, 11(6), Article 2546.
6. Ren, Y. (2021). Optimizing predictive maintenance with machine learning for reliability improvement. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering, 7(3), Article 031001.
7. Steurtewagen, B., & Van den Poel, D. (2021). Adding interpretability to predictive maintenance by machine learning on sensor data. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 152, Article 107381.
8. Bharath Penaka. (2023). AI-Driven Predictive Analytics for Early Detection of High-Risk Patients in Cloud-Based Healthcare Systems . International Journal of Medical Toxicology and Legal Medicine, 26(3 and 4), 118–124. Retrieved from https://ijmtlm.org/index.php/journal/article/view/1506
9. Lu, B., Chen, Z., & Zhao, X. (2021). Data-driven dynamic predictive maintenance for a manufacturing system with quality deterioration and online sensors. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 212, Article 107628.
10. Khan, S., Tsutsumi, S., Yairi, T., & Nakasuka, S. (2021). Robustness of AI-based prognostic and systems health management. Annual Reviews in Control, 51, 130–152.
11. Zhang, H., He, X., Yan, W., Jiang, Z., & Zhu, S. (2022). A machine learning-based approach for product maintenance prediction with reliability information conversion. Autonomous Intelligent Systems, 2, Article 15.
12. Pranitha Potturi. (2023). Cloud-Driven Business Intelligence Modernization for Scalable Enterprise Data Integration and Decision Support. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 11(3s), 387 –. Retrieved from https://www.ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/8505
13. Jiang, Y., Dai, P., Fang, P., Zhong, R. Y., Zhao, X., & Cao, X. (2022). A²-LSTM for predictive maintenance of industrial equipment based on machine learning. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 172, Article 108560.
14. Sharma, D. K., Brahmachari, S., Singhal, K., & Gupta, D. (2022). Data driven predictive maintenance applications for industrial systems with temporal convolutional networks. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 169, Article 108213.
15. Ferreira, C., & Gonçalves, G. (2022). Remaining useful life prediction and challenges: A literature review on the use of machine learning methods. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 63, 550–562.
16. van Dinter, R., Tekinerdogan, B., & Catal, C. (2022). Predictive maintenance using digital twins: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 151, Article 107008.
17. Sasidhar Reddy Mondeddula. (2023). Natural Language Processing for Intelligent Automation of Financial Documents and Banking Operations. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 11(8s), 605–612. Retrieved from https://www.ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/8527
18. Wellsandt, S., Klein, K., Hribernik, K., Lewandowski, M., Bousdekis, A., Mentzas, G., & Thoben, K.-D. (2022). Hybrid-augmented intelligence in predictive maintenance with digital intelligent assistants. Annual Reviews in Control, 53, 382–390.
19. Cao, Q., Zanni-Merk, C., Samet, A., Reich, C., de Bertrand de Beuvron, F., Beckmann, A., & Giannetti, C. (2022). KSPMI: A knowledge-based system for predictive maintenance in Industry 4.0. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 74, Article 102281.
20. Yeardley, A. S., Ejeh, J. O., Allen, L., Brown, S. F., & Cordiner, J. (2022). Integrating machine learning techniques into optimal maintenance scheduling. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 166, Article 107958.
21. Xu, Y., Kohtz, S., Boakye, J., Gardoni, P., & Wang, P. (2023). Physics-informed machine learning for reliability and systems safety applications: State of the art and challenges. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 230, Article 108900.
22. Chen, C., Fu, H., Zheng, Y., Tao, F., & Liu, Y. (2023). The advance of digital twin for predictive maintenance: The role and function of machine learning. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 71, 581–594.
23. Mattaparthi, R. (2023). Deep Learning-Driven Combustion Anomaly Detection in Diesel Powertrains: A Multi-Sensor Fusion Approach for Real-Time ECM Adaptation. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 11, 1084.
24. Zhuang, L., Xu, A., & Wang, X.-L. (2023). A prognostic driven predictive maintenance framework based on Bayesian deep learning. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 234, Article 109181.
25. Taşcı, B., Omar, A., & Ayvaz, S. (2023). Remaining useful lifetime prediction for predictive maintenance in manufacturing. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 184, Article 109566.
26. De Simone, L., Caputo, E., Cinque, M., Galli, A., Moscato, V., Russo, S., Cesaro, G., Criscuolo, V., & Giannini, G. (2023). LSTM-based failure prediction for railway rolling stock equipment. Expert Systems with Applications, 222, Article 119767.
27. Bi, S., Wang, C., Wu, B., Hu, S., Huang, W., Ni, W., Gong, Y., & Wang, X. (2023). A comprehensive survey on applications of AI technologies to failure analysis of industrial systems. Engineering Failure Analysis, 148, Article 107172.
28. Kolla, S. K., & Reddy, V. A. R. (2023). Deep Learning Architectures For Multimodal Medical Data Integration. South Eastern European Journal of Public Health, 248-260.
29. Liao, R., He, Y., Feng, T., Yang, X., Dai, W., & Zhang, W. (2023). Mission reliability-driven risk-based predictive maintenance approach of multistate manufacturing system. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 236, Article 109273.
30. Wesendrup, K., & Hellingrath, B. (2023). Post-prognostics demand management, production, spare parts and maintenance planning for a single-machine system using reinforcement learning. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 179, Article 109216.
31. Elmdoost-gashti, M., Shafiee, M., & Bozorgi-Amiri, A. (2023). Enhancing resilience in marine propulsion systems by adopting machine learning technology for predicting failures and prioritising maintenance activities. Journal of Marine Engineering & Technology, 23(1), 18–32.
