Agent-Led Tenant Experience in Data Center Services
Keywords:
Agentic AI Customer Experience,Enterprise Service Orchestration,AI-Driven Data Center Operations,Autonomous CX Management,Intelligent Service Ecosystems,Enterprise Data Center Automation,AI-Powered Customer Journey Orchestration,Predictive Service Experience Optimization,Multi-Agent Enterprise Support Systems,Adaptive Infrastructure Experience Management.Abstract
A smart city is a complex ecosystem powered by a range of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) systems. Rapid urbanization is placing growing pressure on city officials to modernize services, and the adoption of smart technologies has become key to improving customer satisfaction, delivering better services, and optimizing resource utilization. Interconnected systems can significantly enhance the citizen experience — yet in practice, city services often rely on multiple, dispersed ICT systems that operate independently. This creates a "silos of innovation" problem, where new technologies improve one specific service without accounting for their cascading effects on others, producing outcomes that can feel more like opening a Pandora's box than a coordinated upgrade. Intelligent systems capable of autonomous operation offer a promising way to address this challenge. Agentic Artificial Intelligence (AI) — defined here as smart, autonomous agents capable of making decisions on behalf of users to accomplish defined goals, while coordinating with other agents to serve all users effectively — represents one such approach.
Agentic AI is also driving a new model of customer experience orchestration within enterprise data center service ecosystems, enabling holistic management of customer experience across all components, services, and service channels. Service orchestration refers to the automated, end-to-end coordination of services, where multiple cooperating services combine to deliver a unified outcome for the customer. By enabling ecosystems to continuously Learn and Adapt (L&A) as well as Satisfy and Delight (S&D) customers, Agentic AI supports digitally transformed enterprise service ecosystems that respond to evolving customer preferences and expectations — including real-time L&A and S&D across every customer service interaction.
References
1. Baier, L., Kühl, N., Schüritz, R., & Satzger, G. (2021). Will the customers be happy? Identifying unsatisfied customers from service encounter data. Journal of Service Management, 32(2), 265–288.
2. Ashfaq, M., Yun, J., Yu, S., & Loureiro, S. M. C. (2020). I, chatbot: Modeling the determinants of users’ satisfaction and continuance intention of AI-powered service agents. Telematics and Informatics, 54, 101473.
3. Sheehan, B., Jin, H. S., & Gottlieb, U. (2020). Customer service chatbots: Anthropomorphism and adoption. Journal of Business Research, 115, 14–24.
4. Yandamuri, U. S. (2021). A Comparative Study of Traditional Reporting Systems versus Real-Time Analytics Dashboards in Enterprise Operations. Universal Journal of Business and Management, 1(1), 1-13.
5. Li, L., Lee, K. Y., Emokpae, E., & Yang, S.-B. (2021). What makes you continuously use chatbot services? Evidence from Chinese online travel agencies. Electronic Markets, 31(3), 575–599.
6. Følstad, A., & Taylor, C. (2021). Investigating the user experience of customer service chatbot interaction: A framework for qualitative analysis of chatbot dialogues. Quality and User Experience, 6, Article 6.
7. Hsiao, K.-L., & Chen, C.-C. (2022). What drives continuance intention to use a food-ordering chatbot? An examination of trust and satisfaction. Library Hi Tech, 40(4), 929–946.
8. Chen, Q., Gong, Y., Lu, Y., & Tang, J. (2022). Classifying and measuring the service quality of AI chatbot in frontline service. Journal of Business Research, 145, 552–568.
9. Kharub, I., Lwin, M., Khan, A., & Mubin, O. (2021). Perceived service quality in HRI: Applying the SERVBOT framework. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 8, 746674.
10. Wang, X., Lu, J., Feng, Y., & Liu, L. (2021). Antecedents and mediating role of IT service climate in IT service quality: A mixed methods study. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 102290.
11. Al-Hawari, F., & Barham, H. (2021). A machine learning based help desk system for IT service management. Journal of King Saud University—Computer and Information Sciences, 33(6), 702–718.
12. Mangalampalli, B. M. (2022). Automated Invoice Validation Systems Using Advanced SQL Analytics in Healthcare Insurance. Front Health Inform, 11.
13. Notaro, P., Cardoso, J., & Gerndt, M. (2021). A survey of AIOps methods for failure management. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 12(6), Article 81.
14. Dong, W. (2022). AIOps architecture in data center site infrastructure monitoring. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022, 1988990.
15. Li, X.-Y., Liu, Y., Lin, Y.-H., Xiao, L.-H., Zio, E., & Kang, R. (2021). A generalized Petri net-based modeling framework for service reliability evaluation and management of cloud data centers. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 207, 107381.
16. Moghaddam, S. M. M., O’Sullivan, M., Walker, C. G., Fotuhi Piraghaj, S., & others. (2020). Embedding individualized machine learning prediction models for energy efficient VM consolidation within cloud data centers. Future Generation Computer Systems, 106, 221–233.
17. Mangala, N. (2021). Optimizing Large-Scale ETL Pipelines Using Medallion Architecture on Azure Data Lake. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data, 1(1), 1-20.
18. Liang, B., Dong, X., Wang, Y., & Zhang, X. (2020). Memory-aware resource management algorithm for low-energy cloud data centers. Future Generation Computer Systems, 113, 329–342.
19. Mirhoseininejad, S. M., Badawy, G., & Down, D. G. (2021). Holistic thermal-aware workload management and infrastructure control for heterogeneous data centers using machine learning. Future Generation Computer Systems, 118, 208–218.
20. Mangalampalli, B. M. (2021). Scalable Data Warehouse Architecture for Population Health Management and Predictive Analytics. World Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, 1(1), 1-18.
21. Wang, B., Liu, F., & Lin, W. (2021). Energy-efficient VM scheduling based on deep reinforcement learning. Future Generation Computer Systems, 125, 616–628.
22. Xiao, X., Sun, J., & Yang, J. (2021). Operation and maintenance (O&M) for data center: An intelligent anomaly detection approach. Computer Communications, 178, 141–152.
23. Shoukourian, H., & Kranzlmüller, D. (2020). Forecasting power-efficiency related key performance indicators for modern data centers using LSTMs. Future Generation Computer Systems, 112, 362–382.
24. Saxena, D., & Singh, A. K. (2021). A proactive autoscaling and energy-efficient VM allocation framework using online multi-resource neural network for cloud data center. Neurocomputing, 426, 248–264.
25. Yandamuri, U. S. (2022). Big Data Pipelines for Cross-Domain Decision Support: A Cloud-Centric Approach. International Journal of Scientific Research and Modern Technology, 1(12), 227-237.
26. Caviglione, L., Gaggero, M., Paolucci, M., & Ronco, R. (2021). Deep reinforcement learning for multi-objective placement of virtual machines in cloud datacenters. Soft Computing, 25, 12569–12588.
27. Asghari, A., Sohrabi, M. K., & Yaghmaee, F. (2020). A cloud resource management framework for multiple online scientific workflows using cooperative reinforcement learning agents. Computer Networks, 179, 107340.
28. Hu, X., & Sun, Y. (2020). A deep reinforcement learning-based power resource management for fuel cell powered data centers. Electronics, 9(12), 2054.
29. Viola, L., Ronchieri, E., & Cavallaro, C. (2022). Combining log files and monitoring data to detect anomaly patterns in a data center. Computers, 11(8), 117.
30. Li, J., Zhang, R., & Zheng, Y. (2022). QoS-aware and multi-objective virtual machine dynamic scheduling for big data centers in clouds. Soft Computing, 26, 10239–10252.
31. Mangala, N. (2021). CI/CD Pipeline Automation for Enterprise Data Artifacts Using Azure DevOps. Universal Journal of Business and Management, 1(1), 1-18.
